In the early 2000s, Apple and Google did not dominate the mobile
telephone market, but rather a company called Research in Motion (RIM) producing
a mobile device for both phone and email, the Blackberry. The technology was a massive
breakthrough for the email-obsessed culture at that time. RIM developed push
email, which enabled users to receive messages on their Blackberry device
rather than constantly fetching new messages. The device featured a full-functioning
keyboard, mimicking the standard desktop version, enabling users to produce
messages as opposed to the numeric-only keypad quickly. Blackberry’s popularity
exploded, and the corporation developed an aggressive marketing plan targeted
at the corporate mobile market (Gustin, 2013).
Unfortunately for Blackberry, several forces eventually led to the
organization’s downfall. First, there was a cultural force; while the
organization targeted the corporate market, competitors such as Apple and
Google were laser-focused on the consumer market. The push email technology was
not proprietary to RIM, and the competition included it as a native piece of
software (Appolonia, 2019). Secondly, as Apple and Google had
established products in the consumer space with music devices and next
generation cellular telephones, there was a significant technological force. The
foundational device seamlessly integrated with email. Lastly, there was a
social force at work, as the mobile device was on the brink of becoming an
enabler for various media types, including telephone, camera, music, email, and
the emerging social media market (Weber et al., 2011).
The topic for my sociotechnical plan is the emerging digital
workplace, which has drastically changed due to an environmental force,
COVID-19. As organizations continue to adjust to support the remote worker,
some advantages have surfaced (Attaran et al., 2019). First, remote employees do not need
to be in the physical location of the corporate campus. The flexibility enables
a broader and more diverse workforce located across the country or even the
world. Second, by enabling a remote workforce, organizations are forecasting
cost savings in space costs. Lastly, the digital workplace enables a level of
agility for an organization. For example, rather than arranging cross-country
business trips, collaboration is enabled remotely, providing a more efficient
experience and realized cost savings (PNNL
Researchers Confront COVID-19 Challenges, 2021).
The correlation between the Blackberry example and the digital
workplace relies on two significant forces that require a sociotechnical plan. First,
cultural forces affect both situations. The Blackberry strategic plan failed to
account for the consumer market and the factors driving it. For the digital
workplace, the end-user experience, whether corporate or consumer, is key to
success. The end-user must feel engaged, collaborative, and part of a team
while participating remotely (Attaran et al., 2019). Secondly, the technological force is
a significant driver in both examples. RIM was unable to keep pace with user
needs, the experience, and future innovation. The digital workplace also has
technical challenges to address, such as the hybrid experience, where part of a
team is on campus, and others are remote. The audio and visual experience must
improve, with strategic plans for integrating new tools and repurposing
existing ones (Attaran et al., 2019).
References
Appolonia, A. (2019). How BlackBerry went from controlling the smartphone market to a phone of the past. Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/blackberry-smartphone-rise-fall-mobile-failure-innovate-2019-11
Attaran, M., Attaran, S., & Kirkland, D. (2019). The need for digital workplace: increasing workforce productivity in the information age. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 15(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2019010101
Gustin, S. (2013). The Fatal Mistake that Doomed Blackberry. Time Magazine. https://business.time.com/2013/09/24/the-fatal-mistake-that-doomed-blackberry/
PNNL Researchers Confront COVID-19 Challenges. (2021). https://www.pnnl.gov/covid
Weber,
A., Haas, M., & Scuka, D. (2011). Mobile service innovation: A European
failure. Telecommunications Policy, 35(5),
469-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.03.002
No comments:
Post a Comment